Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Randall, Ashley K.; Leon, Gabriel; Basili, Emanuele; Martos, Tamas; Boiger, Michael; Baldi, Michela; Hocker, Lauren; Kline, Kai; Masturzi, Alessio; Aryeetey, Richmond; Bar-Kalifa, Eran; Boon, Susan D.; Botella, Luis; Burke, Tom; Carnelley, Katherine B.; Carr, Alan; Dash, Arobindu; Fitriana, Mimi; Gaines, Stanley O.; Jr.; Galdiolo, Sarah; Hart, Claire M.; Joo, Susanna; Kanth, Barani; Karademas, Evangelos; Karantzas, Gery; Landolt, Selina A.; McHugh, Louise; Milek, Anne; Murphy, Eddie; Natividade, Jean C.; Portugal, Alda; Quinones, Alvaro; Relvas, Ana Paula; Rumondor, Pingkan C.; Rusu, Petruta; Sallay, Viola; Saul, Luis Angel; Schmitt, David P.; Sels, Laura; Shujja, Sultan; Taylor, Laura K.; Ozguluk, S.; Verhofstadt, Leslie; Yoo, Gyesook; Zemp, Martina; Donato, Silvia; Totenhagen, Casey J.; van Eickels, Rahel L.; Adil, Adnan; Anaba, Emmanuel Anongeba; Asampong, Emmanuel; Beauchemin-Roy, Sarah; Berry, Anna; Brassard, Audrey; Chesterman, Susan; Ferguson, Lizzie; Fonseca, Gabriela; Gaugue, Justine; Geonet, Marie; Hermesch, Neele; Abdul Wahab Khan, Rahmattullah Khan; Knox, Laura; Lafontaine, Marie-France; Lawless, Nicholas; Londero-Santos, Amanda; Major, Sofia; Marot, Tiago A.; Mullins, Ellie; Otermans, Pauldy C.; Pagani, Ariela F.; Parise, Miriam; Parvin, Roksana; De, Mallika; Peloquin, Katherine; Rebelo, Barbara; Righetti, Francesca; Romano, Daniel; Salavati, Sara; Samrock, Steven; Serea, Mary; Seok, Chua Bee; Sotero, Luciana; Stafford, Owen; Thomadakis, Christoforos; Topcu-Uzer, Cigdem; Ugarte, Carla; Low, Wah Yun; Simon-Zambori, Petra; Siau, Ching Sin; Duca, Diana-Sinziana; Filip, Cornelia; Park, Hayoung; Wearen, Sinead; Bodenmann, Guy; Chiarolanza, Claudia.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships ; 39(1):3-33, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-2277720

RESUMO

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 39(1) of Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (see record 2022-18336-005). Three new authors (Adnan Adil, Emmanuel Asampong, and Rahmattullah Khan Abdul Wahab Khan) were not initially listed in the Epub ahead of print. Table 1 also contained some errors. The corrections are given in the erratum.] Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the "new normal"-social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March-July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

3.
Randall, Ashley K.; Leon, Gabriel, Basili, Emanuele, Martos, Tamás, Boiger, Michael, Baldi, Michela, Hocker, Lauren, Kline, Kai, Masturzi, Alessio, Aryeetey, Richmond, Bar-Kalifa, Eran, Boon, Susan D.; Botella, Luis, Burke, Tom, Carnelley, Katherine, Carr, Alan, Dash, Arobindu, Fitriana, Mimi, Gaines, Stanley O.; Galdiolo, Sarah, Claire M, Hart, Joo, Susanna, Kanth, Barani, Karademas, Evangelos, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, Selina A.; McHugh, Louise, Milek, Anne, Murphy, Eddie, Natividade, Jean C.; Portugal, Alda, Quiñones, Álvaro, Relvas, Ana Paula, Rumondor, Pingkan C. B.; Rusu, Petruta, Sallay, Viola, Saul, Luis Angel, Schmitt, David P.; Sels, Laura, Shujja, Sultan, Taylor, Laura K.; Ozguluk, S. Burcu, Verhofstadt, Leslie, Yoo, Gyesook, Zemp, Martina, Donato, Silvia, Totenhagen, Casey J.; van Eickels, Rahel L.; Anaba, Emmanuel Anongeba, Beauchemin-Roy, Sarah, Berry, Anna, Brassard, Audrey, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, Lizzie, Fonseca, Gabriela, Gaugue, Justine, Geonet, Marie, Hermesch, Neele, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, Marie-France, Lawless, Nicholas, Londero-Santos, Amanda, Major, Sofia, Marot, Tiago A.; Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, Pauldy C. J.; Ariela F, Pagani, Parise, Miriam, Parvin, Roksana, De, Mallika, Péloquin, Katherine, Rebelo, Bárbara, Righetti, Francesca, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, Sara, Samrock, Steven, Serea, Mary, Seok, Chua Bee, Sotero, Luciana, Stafford, Owen, Thomadakis, Christoforos, Topcu-Uzer, Cigdem, Ugarte, Carla, Yun, Low Wah, Simon-Zámbori, Petra, Siau, Ching Sin, Duca, Diana-Sînziana, Filip, Cornelia, Park, Hayoung, Wearen, Sinead, Bodenmann, Guy, Chiarolanza, Claudia.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships ; : 02654075211034236, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | Sage | ID: covidwho-1374048

RESUMO

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the ?new normal??social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March?July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

4.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0238971, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760707

RESUMO

Globally, little evidence exists on transmission patterns of COVID-19. Recommendations to prevent infection include appropriate and frequent handwashing plus physical and social distancing. We conducted an exploratory observational study to assess compliance with these recommendations in selected transportation stations in Ghana. A one-hour audit of 45 public transport stations in the Greater Accra region was carried out between 27th and 29th March 2020. Using an adapted World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene assessment scale, the availability and use of handwashing facilities, social distancing, and ongoing public education on COVID-19 prevention measures were assessed, weighted and scored to determine the level of compliance of stations. Compliance with recommendations was categorized as "inadequate" "basic", "intermediate" and "advanced", based on the overall score. Majority (80%) of stations in Accra have at least one Veronica Bucket with flowing water and soap, but the number of washing places at each station is not adequate. Only a small minority (18%) of stations were communicating the need to wash hands frequently and appropriately, and to practice social/physical distancing while at the station. In most stations (95%), hand washing practice was either not observed, or only infrequently. Almost all stations (93%) did not have alcohol-based hand sanitizers available for public use, while social distancing was rarely practiced (only 2%). In over 90% of the stations, face masks were either not worn or only worn by a few passengers. Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures was inadequate in 13 stations, basic in 16 stations, intermediate in 7 stations, and advanced in 9 stations. Compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures in public transportation stations in the Greater Accra region remains a challenge. Awareness creation should aim to elevate COVID-19 risk perception of transportation operators and clients. Transport operators and stations need support and guidance to enforce hand washing and social distancing.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Meios de Transporte/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19 , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Gana , Humanos , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Organização Mundial da Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA